My Friend Hitler

By Quintilian

Counter Currents, March 2018


Yukio Mishima
My Friend Hitler and Other Plays of Yukio Mishima
Translated by Hiroaki Sato
New York: Columbia University Press, 2002

Yukio Mishima (1925-1970) is best known as a novelist and Right-wing activist who famously and publicly committed ritual suicide in 1970 one day after he had finished his tetralogy The Sea of Fertility. He was, however, a very prolific playwright with more than sixty plays to his name, most of which were produced during his lifetime, often with Mishima performing one of the lead roles. My Friend Hitler was first produced in 1969, and in one production Mishima performed the role of Hitler.

The play is an attempt at an objective analysis of the thinking that went into the Roehm Purge of 1934, what is commonly known as the Night of the Long Knives. In this event, Hitler disposed of his good friend Ernst Roehm, the leader of the SA, who had been threatening to initiate a second “revolution” in which the SA would replace the German Army. In eliminating Roehm and vastly decreasing the size and influence of the SA, Hitler secured the loyalty of the leadership of the German Army and its acquiescence to Hitler’s assumption of the powers of the Reich presidency after Hindenburg died, thereby consolidating Hitler’s dictatorial authority.

The three-act play has just four characters: Hitler, then industrialist Gustav Krupp, Roehm, and Gregor Strasser, a former Nazi leading light who was a leader of the “socialist” wing of the NSDAP. It is June 1934 and Hitler is delivering a speech from the balcony of the Chancellery. As he is giving his speech, Krupp, Roehm, and Strasser sit in Hitler’s office, debating the next phase of the German “Revolution.” Hitler finishes his speech, and Roehm and Strasser make their cases respectively for “Right” and “Left” courses for the future of the Reich. Hitler asks Roehm and Strasser to meet with him the next day for breakfast, at which time Hitler will elaborate upon his plans for the future. Roehm and Strasser leave, and when Hitler remarks to Krupp that he has reached a moment of decision, Krupp responds, “You aren’t up to it, Adolf; you aren’t up to it yet . . .”

In Act II, Roehm appears at the Chancellery for breakfast. He and Hitler reminisce about their years of struggle to assume political power. Strasser never appears. When Roehm leaves, Krupp appears from behind a curtain where he has been eavesdropping at Hitler’s behest. As Roehm leaves the Chancellery, he is confronted by Strasser, who tells Roehm that they must put their differences aside in order to remove Hitler from office and continue the German “revolution.” If they don’t, Hitler will have both of them killed. Roehm scoffs at Strasser, rejects his offer, and proclaims his loyalty to “my friend Hitler.”

Act III begins after Roehm and Strasser have been assassinated and the events of the Night of the Long Knives have been set in motion. Hitler arrives back in Berlin and finds Krupp waiting for him at the Chancellery. Hitler relates to Krupp the events that have transpired, and the play ends with this dialogue:

Krupp: (He sits comfortably in a chair) I should say. We can now leave everything to you without any worry. Adolf, you did well. You cut down the left and, as you turned the sword back, cut down the right.

Hitler: (He walks to stage center) Yes, government must take the middle road.

The play is remarkable for its emphasizing the political thinking and rational weighing of choices that went into Hitler’s decision to purge Roehm and the SA and many other enemies rather than concentrating on the gory consequences of that decision. In so doing, Mishima makes Hitler’s use of trumped-up charges of treason against Roehm appear to be little different than George Bush’s false allegations of the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq as a reason to depose Saddam Hussein, rather than attacking the true perpetrators of 9/11. Whether it be Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” or Hitler’s “middle road,” Mishima reminds us that true nationalism and the interests of the Volk are always in danger of being subverted by the Krupps and the others among the globalist elites whose only allegiances are to their bottom lines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.